<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast 42 &#8211; First Look: Steinberg&#8217;s Sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macaudioguy.com/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macaudioguy.com/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/</link>
	<description>The Mac Audio Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: audio editing. - MacTalk Forums</title>
		<link>http://macaudioguy.com/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/comment-page-1/#comment-20362</link>
		<dc:creator>audio editing. - MacTalk Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macaudioguy.com/2008/04/13/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/#comment-20362</guid>
		<description>[...] Just check the specs between the Cubase and the MBP, which probably just needs to be Core 2 Duo. 4 GB of RAM would be better than 2.  Unless they need to transfer back and forth between Mac/Windows, it might be time to introduce them to Garage Band, as this long time Cubase user found. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just check the specs between the Cubase and the MBP, which probably just needs to be Core 2 Duo. 4 GB of RAM would be better than 2.  Unless they need to transfer back and forth between Mac/Windows, it might be time to introduce them to Garage Band, as this long time Cubase user found. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deekstar Jellybotty guy</title>
		<link>http://macaudioguy.com/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/comment-page-1/#comment-7346</link>
		<dc:creator>Deekstar Jellybotty guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macaudioguy.com/2008/04/13/podcast-42-_-first-look-steinbergs-sequel/#comment-7346</guid>
		<description>I &#039;ve just started using Garageband om my girlfriends iMac and find the whole set up amazingly simple.It inspired me to record an epic song within a few hours, it was only supposed to be a demo! the song became a symphony just using Garageband samples, obviously the system itself told me about this &quot;Mac audio guy&quot; website, so I&#039;m here reading through all the good info.I stopped at this section because in the past we have always used Steinberg eqiuipment, even from the very first Atari Pro 24 steinberg release, yes the one before Cubase was even invented 18 years ago. This website, however is a brilliant resource for garageband and I&#039;m hooked already, can&#039;t believe you guys provide these services for free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I &#8216;ve just started using Garageband om my girlfriends iMac and find the whole set up amazingly simple.It inspired me to record an epic song within a few hours, it was only supposed to be a demo! the song became a symphony just using Garageband samples, obviously the system itself told me about this &#8220;Mac audio guy&#8221; website, so I&#8217;m here reading through all the good info.I stopped at this section because in the past we have always used Steinberg eqiuipment, even from the very first Atari Pro 24 steinberg release, yes the one before Cubase was even invented 18 years ago. This website, however is a brilliant resource for garageband and I&#8217;m hooked already, can&#8217;t believe you guys provide these services for free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

